Loading... Please wait...

2017 Case Law Update (Flash Drive)


Self-study hours are logged by the listener and the one page list is kept in an MCLE compliance folder. The log requires a listing of each program title, the program's approved MCLE provider name, program length, and whether or not that program contains mandatory subfield credit (legal ethics, elimination of bias, or prevention of substance abuse.)

Participatory hours require a proctor (any adult who is not simultaneously using the same program for participatory credit) to complete and sign documents accompanying each participatory program. Those completed and signed documents are subsequently returned to Versatape and individual certificates of compliance are prepared and returned to the listener to be filed in a MCLE compliance folder. Versatape will also keep a copy of the certificates of compliance on file. If audited the State Bar will be looking for a copy of those completed certificates of compliance and a copy of the self -study hours log.

Note: Please note MCLE audio program hours listened to in excess of 25 hours in a 3-year compliance period cannot be carried over into the next 3-year cycle.

What's the Difference?

There are three options for building MCLE Audio Packages:

Turnkey Solution
Just click and add the select audio package to your cart and we will assemble it for you based on best selling and recent programs.

Choose Your Interested Areas of Law
Choose your categories of interest and we will select available programs from the areas you choose. Additionally, you can add specific programs SKU's numbers which will be included in your package in addition to your preferred categories.

Assemble Your Own
Assemble your own 12 hour, 13 hour. or 25 hour package. Simply copy and paste the SKU number of each program you would like included into the Specific Programs Desired section and we will build your custom package for you. Remember to include the required subfield hours (if you need them): 4 hours of legal ethics, 1 hour of the elimination of bias and 1 hour of the prevention of substance abuse programs to your list (we can select them for you if you desire).

How They Work

MCLE: 1 Hour

Our speaker, Mark Kahn presents his annual review. 

Medical Treatment and UR

  • Ramirez v. WCAB (Court of Appeal Published) (82 CCC 327)

  • Stevens v. Outspoken Enterprises, Inc. (BPD) (45 WCR 147)

  • Baker v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Court of Appeal unpublished, Third District Court of Appeal) (82 CCC 61)

  • Payne V. Federal Express (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 243)

  • Swengel v. Cambridge (BPD) (45 CWCR 38)

  • Rodriguez v. Simi Valley Unified School District (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. P.D. LEXIS 671) (45 CWCR 19)

  • Schendel V. B & B Sales (BPD) (45 CWCR 41)

  • Juan Rivas, Applicant v. North American Trailer (BPD) (2016 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 572)

  • Esperanza Sanchez v. Dunlap Manufacturing Inc. (BPD) ( 2016 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 407)

  • Weimer v. Hillyard Inc. (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 104) (45 CWCR 73) 


  • Catlin v. J.C. Penny (BPD) Espinzoa V. GFC holdings (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS (106)

  • Espinoza V. GFC Holdings (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS (239)

  • Dorantes v. Dirito Brothers (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 237)

  • Granillo, Applicant v. Southern Farmland (BPD) ( 2016 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 590)

  • Garza v. O’Reily Auto Parts (BPD) (1017 Cal. Wrk. Com. P.D. LEXIS 3) 


  • Antonio Vargas v. Darrell Becker; Becker Construction (BPD) (ADJ8647584) (LEXIS) 

LABOR CODE §4660.1(c)

  • Madson v. Caraletto Ranches (BPD) (45 CWCR 65)

  • Torres v. Greenbrae (BPD) (45 CWCR 152) 


  • Irving v. J.P Morgan Chase (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 93) 


  • Keltner v. California Guest Services (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS (94) 


  • City of Jackson v. WCAB (Rice) (Court of Appeal Published) (82 CCC 437) (45 CWCR 89)

  • Villacis v. County of Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (BDP) (45 CWCR 95) (EXPERT MEDICAL EVIDENCE NEEDED IN ATTEMPTED SUICIDE CASE)

  • Zhu v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (Court of Appeal) ( ____CCC_____)

  • County of Sacramento Contracts v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (McCartney) (Court of Appeal, unpublished) (____CCC____)

  • Rockefeller v. Department of Corrections (BPD) (45 CWCR 150)

  • Puccio v. Online Graphics (BPD) (45 CWCR 155)

  • Bass v. State of California Department of Corrections (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 213)

  • Ponce v. Barrett Business Services (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 220) 


  • Baker v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Guerrero) (Court of Appeal Published) (___CCC____)

  • Moon v. Southern Cal. Edison (BPD) (45 CWCR 154) 

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, JURISDICTION AND LABOR CODE §5500.5 Iniguez v. WCAB (Court of Appeal, Not Published) (45 CWCR 93) (82 CCC 310)

  • County of Riverside v. WCAB (Sylves) (Court of Appeal, published) (82 CCC 4 )

  • Arce v. Phillips-Van Heusen (BPD) (2017 Cal. Wrk. P.D. LEXIS 656) 

46 page program materials included. Speaker: Hon. Mark Kahn. Recorded October 18, 2017. MCLE credit: 1 hour



This product hasn't received any reviews yet. Be the first to review this product!

Write your own product review
Programs by MCLE Approved Providers:

San Fernando Valley Bar Association (#451)

Pasadena Bar Association (#531)

You Recently Viewed...